2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal mate assessment by male praying mantids in a sexually cannibalistic mating system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All females remained on a diet of two crickets three times a week and water daily so that fixed size and body condition were controlled for (fixed size = 16.085 ± 0.143 mm, n = 30; body condition = 0.062 ± 0.002, n = 30). Previous studies found that virgin females with similar body conditions were attractive to males (Barry in review; Barry et al 2010). There was no significant difference in the age of females between the three treatment groups (One-way ANOVA: F 8 = 1.567, P = 0.240).…”
Section: Female Re-mating Frequencymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All females remained on a diet of two crickets three times a week and water daily so that fixed size and body condition were controlled for (fixed size = 16.085 ± 0.143 mm, n = 30; body condition = 0.062 ± 0.002, n = 30). Previous studies found that virgin females with similar body conditions were attractive to males (Barry in review; Barry et al 2010). There was no significant difference in the age of females between the three treatment groups (One-way ANOVA: F 8 = 1.567, P = 0.240).…”
Section: Female Re-mating Frequencymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…During our double mating trials, there was no difference in the approach behaviour of males or the likelihood of sexual cannibalism between virgin and mated females. However, locating a female visually and without the initial chemical attraction typical for these animals is unlikely to occur in nature because of the low-density populations recorded for many praying mantid species (Maxwell 1999;Barry et al 2010). There is, however, the possibility that two or more males will be simultaneously chemically attracted to a female and wait for their turn to mate (Barry in review; Maxwell et al 2010).…”
Section: Sperm Precedence Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another possibility is that males are able to uncover cheaters by basing their mate choice on multiple signals/traits [45,46]. Indeed, male mantids can visually perceive variation in female condition and fecundity and choose well-fed females in a simultaneous choice scenario [21,33]. However, they do not reject poorly fed females if they are the only option [28,47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In praying mantids, the fitness cost of this deception for males is potentially severe-food-limited females are not only less fecund [18,21,29] but also significantly more likely to cannibalize than well-fed females ( [21,28,[30][31][32]; table 1). In spite of the Femme Fatale hypothesis, honest signalling systems have been demonstrated in all cannibalistic mantid species studied thus far [18,[20][21][22]33,34]. The overwhelming consensus is for complete differential attraction to females in good condition; that is, well-fed females are chemically attractive to males, whereas hungry females in poor condition are almost exclusively unattractive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%