2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.03848
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal PET/CT Tumour Segmentation and Prediction of Progression-Free Survival using a Full-Scale UNet with Attention

Abstract: Segmentation of head and neck (H&N) tumours and prediction of patient outcome are crucial for patient's disease diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Current developments of robust deep learning models are hindered by the lack of large multi-centre, multi-modal data with quality annotations. The MICCAI 2021 HEad and neCK TumOR (HECKTOR) segmentation and outcome prediction challenge creates a platform for comparing segmentation methods of the primary gross target volume on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET and Compute… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Clinical + DeepFeat + Radiomics combination led to a C-index of 0.786, which was lower than the Deep-Features + Radiomics combination, meaning that we could achieve accurate predictions of patients’ survival days without employing clinical data. Table 11 also demonstrated that the features based on radiomics and DeepFeat achieved the highest C-index scores (0.821) compared to those of methods that were specially designed for the prediction of patients’ survival days, such as [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Clinical + DeepFeat + Radiomics combination led to a C-index of 0.786, which was lower than the Deep-Features + Radiomics combination, meaning that we could achieve accurate predictions of patients’ survival days without employing clinical data. Table 11 also demonstrated that the features based on radiomics and DeepFeat achieved the highest C-index scores (0.821) compared to those of methods that were specially designed for the prediction of patients’ survival days, such as [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, 1505 regions of interest were left as inputs of model. In experiments, two SOTA methods were selected as benchmark methods, which are derived from reference [6] and [7] respectively. In reference [6], SqueezeNet was used to process WSI data in survival analysis task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reference [6], SqueezeNet was used to process WSI data in survival analysis task. In reference [7], a survival analysis method based on U-Net was proposed. Both approaches achieve SOTA performance on the corresponding data set.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation