2017
DOI: 10.1080/17405904.2017.1382381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal strategies of emotional governance: a critical analysis of ‘nudge’ tactics in health policy

Abstract: In the second half of the 20 th century a new alliance was formed between political aspirations for a healthy population and personal aspirations to be well: health was to be ensured by instrumentalising anxiety and shaping the hopes and fears of individuals and families for their own biological destiny.' (Rose, 2001: 17) 'We should design policies that help the least sophisticated people in society while imposing the smallest possible costs on the most sophisticated' (Thaler and Sunstein, 2009: 252)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This metasynthesis is based on empirical studies, resulting in the automatic exclusion of theoretical articles on nudging. However, nudging techniques and their relation to behavior change in public health lifestyle interventions need to be understood in the broader context of behavioral economics and the political, cultural, and social contexts in which nudging occurs (Leggett, 2014; Mulderrig, 2018, 2019). Therefore, it would be valuable in future studies to extend the critical discussion of the findings of this metasynthesis in relation to public health discourses and public policies, as well as discussions of the ethical challenges posed by nudging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This metasynthesis is based on empirical studies, resulting in the automatic exclusion of theoretical articles on nudging. However, nudging techniques and their relation to behavior change in public health lifestyle interventions need to be understood in the broader context of behavioral economics and the political, cultural, and social contexts in which nudging occurs (Leggett, 2014; Mulderrig, 2018, 2019). Therefore, it would be valuable in future studies to extend the critical discussion of the findings of this metasynthesis in relation to public health discourses and public policies, as well as discussions of the ethical challenges posed by nudging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, researchers from fields such as the political sciences and critical public health have criticized the soft-governance techniques in nudges that rely on individualized, behavioristic, and paternalistic interventions to correct “unhealthy behaviors” while ignoring the role of social context as well as cultural and material inequalities (Mulderrig, 2019; Wilkins, 2013). Mulderrig (2018), for example, has characterized nudging as a technique of biopolitical governance (Foucault, 2007) whose aim is to produce self-regulating citizens with health behaviors that comply with predetermined health norms, potentially establishing a disjuncture between individuals’ social values and situations, and public policy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of scholars who both critically and thoroughly empirically evaluate the behavioural state's legitimacy exist but are rare (e.g. Lepenies & Malecka 2018;Mulderrig 2018). Also, they seem to only reach a small, and exclusively academic audience.…”
Section: Critical-reflexive and Interdisciplinary Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such processes derive from commercial branding practices, where brand equity – the value of a brand as constituted by the subjective meanings and socio‐emotional functions that the brand has or fulfils for consumers – is boosted through strategic moves that successfully cultivate attachments around the brand (Kapferer, 2008). As such, neoliberalized government communication involves stimulating, appropriating and mobilizing citizen‐consumer affect to generate support for and ownership of government policies and programmes, as well as to spur citizen action and shape subjectivities amenable to the government agenda (Mulderrig, 2018; Pedwell, 2014).…”
Section: Neoliberalized Political Engagement and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%