2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimodal stress detection: Testing for covariation in vocal, hormonal and physiological responses to Trier Social Stress Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, in two recent papers, we show that increases in cortisol levels under lab-induced psychosocial stress (Trier Social Stress Test) and under naturally occurring stress (oral examination) predict increases in voice fundamental frequency ( F 0, pitch) among women (Pisanski, Nowak, et al., 2016; Pisanski et al., 2018). Similarly, Buchanan et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Importantly, in two recent papers, we show that increases in cortisol levels under lab-induced psychosocial stress (Trier Social Stress Test) and under naturally occurring stress (oral examination) predict increases in voice fundamental frequency ( F 0, pitch) among women (Pisanski, Nowak, et al., 2016; Pisanski et al., 2018). Similarly, Buchanan et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In the present study, we tested whether changes in the salivary cortisol levels and vocal parameters of speakers who were recorded under real-life stress predict listeners’ voice-based judgments of those speakers’ stress levels. Importantly, in light of recent evidence that vocal changes under stress covary with the magnitude of the biological stress response (Buchanan et al., 2014; Pisanski, Nowak, et al., 2016; Pisanski et al., 2018), we test the prediction that listeners’ stress ratings will correlate positively with the underlying cortisol levels of speakers, and with their stress-linked vocal parameters, particularly voice pitch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet, while NLPs have received attention from researchers studying the evolution and functions of animal calls [5][6][7][8][9], the nature of this information, and thus the function of NLPs in human and animal vocalizations, remains debated. NLPs primarily occur when f 0 or subglottal pressure are high, which is indicative of high vocal effort and an aroused physiological state [5,10]. In addition, NLPs render a signal less predictable, which attracts attention [7] and reduces habituation in listeners [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make our findings more generalizable, in this study, we tested two types of NLPs (subharmonics/sidebands and chaos) and four types of nonverbal vocalizations: screams, roars, gasps and moans (table 1). 5 [1,10] 22 [15,27] 25 [16,32] 33 [25,36] [15,25] 18 [14,23] 15 [8,17] 13 [7,26] 17 [11,27] 27 [16,37] a HNR (harmonics-to-noise ratio) for the three manipulations: no NLPs (top value), subharmonics/sidebands (centre), and chaos (bottom). royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos R. Soc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%