2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2018.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimode tool tip dynamics prediction based on transfer learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method can not only predict the performance of the machine tool, but also be more convenient for the performance analysis of the machine tool with the tool spindle combination changed. Chen et al [ 23 ] and Liu et al [ 24 ] combined substructure coupling with deep learning and used the transfer learning method to predict tool tip dynamic information at different positions. The existing modal [ 25 ] analysis methods are limited to the static conditions of machine tools, and most of them are applied to the transition of machining state, and few of them are used to analyze the influence of cutting force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method can not only predict the performance of the machine tool, but also be more convenient for the performance analysis of the machine tool with the tool spindle combination changed. Chen et al [ 23 ] and Liu et al [ 24 ] combined substructure coupling with deep learning and used the transfer learning method to predict tool tip dynamic information at different positions. The existing modal [ 25 ] analysis methods are limited to the static conditions of machine tools, and most of them are applied to the transition of machining state, and few of them are used to analyze the influence of cutting force.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And in addition, the predicted FRFs at the base points were further used to predict the FRFs for different tools based on the receptance coupling substructure analysis (RCSA). Similarly, considering the different tool-holder assemblies, Liu and Chen et al [17,18] used transfer learning to predict the pose-dependent tool tip dynamics by integrating domain adaptation and adaptive weighting. Once the pose-dependent tool tip dynamics were obtained by sufficient impact tests, only few impact tests to measure the new tool tip dynamics were required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e fitting methods are widely used to calculate the dynamic parameters based on FRF. Liu et al [14] used a fitting method to achieve the dynamic parameters of the tooltip from FRF. Sun and Altintas [15] and Song et al [16] build FRF of the cutting tool by impact test and identified the modal parameters using the fitting method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun and Altintas [15] and Song et al [16] build FRF of the cutting tool by impact test and identified the modal parameters using the fitting method. From [13][14][15][16], it is known that the fitting method is easily performed in computing the modal parameters. However, the fitting method always tries to obtain a mean curve of FRF which would dismiss the peaks of the original FRF curve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%