2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2007.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimoment convecting flux tube model of the polar wind system with return current and microprocesses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, 3-dimensional, time-dependent modeling is needed to properly describe ionosphere-polar wind structures. There are several papers on the polar wind that provide an update on our current understanding (Barakat and Schunk, 2006;Banerjee and Gavrishchaka, 2007;Lemaire et al, 2007;Schunk, 2007;Tam et al, 2007;Yau et al, 2007). A substantial plasma structuring occurs even for the classical polar wind and even when relatively simple time-dependent plasma convection and particle precipitation patterns are adopted (cf.…”
Section: Ion Polar Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, 3-dimensional, time-dependent modeling is needed to properly describe ionosphere-polar wind structures. There are several papers on the polar wind that provide an update on our current understanding (Barakat and Schunk, 2006;Banerjee and Gavrishchaka, 2007;Lemaire et al, 2007;Schunk, 2007;Tam et al, 2007;Yau et al, 2007). A substantial plasma structuring occurs even for the classical polar wind and even when relatively simple time-dependent plasma convection and particle precipitation patterns are adopted (cf.…”
Section: Ion Polar Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, performance of standard ML approaches could quickly deteriorate with severe data limitations, high dimensionality and non-stationarity [149,150]. Domain-expert knowledge including physical models based on deeper understanding of the considered complex system, such as the kinetic processes discussed in this article, could play a key role in applications with severe incompleteness of training data because of natural dimensionality reduction and usage of domain-specific constraints [149,150,151]. Typical practical example of the domain knowledge incorporation into ML solution is selection of model inputs and drivers using physics-based considerations [144,145,146,150].…”
Section: Comprehensive Modeling Of Space Plasma Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, collection of simplified physical models with a few adjustable empirical parameters, e.g. anomalous coefficients capturing small-scale effects, could be used as base models in boosting algorithms to create ensemble of interpretable models with boosted accuracy and stability compared to a single model [149,150,151]. Alternatively, simplified physical models capturing multi-scale effects in an approximate manner can be used to generate large amounts of synthetic data for all possible regimes.…”
Section: Comprehensive Modeling Of Space Plasma Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the important problem of space-weather forecasting (i.e. prediction of storms and sub-storms in Earth's magnetosphere) is very challenging due to the interplay of physical processes of a vast range of time and spatial scales [50]. Besides the obvious drastic limitation of computing power, the fine-grain initial and boundary conditions are not known; it is impossible to have a satellite in every spatial location simultaneously.…”
Section: Synergy Of Physics-based Models and Machine Learning Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, different kinds of model reformulations allow useful practical results to be obtained. Often, small-scale kinetic effects are introduced as anomalous coefficients into large-scale fluid simulations without running small-scale simulations [50]. One can also approximate the whole magnetosphere-ionosphere system as a giant, but a simple, electric circuit with just a few main elements having characteristics inferred from deeper physical models (analog models) [56].…”
Section: Synergy Of Physics-based Models and Machine Learning Inmentioning
confidence: 99%