2009
DOI: 10.1137/080726719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiname and Multiscale Default Modeling

Abstract: Multiname default modeling is crucial in the context of pricing credit derivatives such as Collaterized Debt Obligations (CDOs). We consider here a simple reduced form approach for multiname defaults based on the Vasicek or Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model for the hazard rates of the underlying names. We analyze the impact of volatility time scales on the default distribution and CDO prices. We demonstrate how correlated fluctuations in the parameters of the name hazard rates affect the loss distribution and senior tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these and many other cases, the probability of n hitting any finite level H in finite time is strictly positive. Models with this feature are ubiquitous in the literature (see Arnsdorf and Halperin 2008, Bayraktar and Yang 2009, Berndt et al 2005, Carr and Linetsky 2006, Cont and Jessen 2011, Ding et al 2009, Duffie and Garleanu 2001, Eckner 2009, Errais et al 2010, Feldhütter 2007, Fouque et al 2009, Jarrow et al 2005, Longstaff and Rajan 2008, Mortensen 2006, Pan and Singleton 2008, Papageorgiou and Sircar 2007, and many others).…”
Section: Conventional Acceptance/rejection Schemementioning
confidence: 95%
“…In these and many other cases, the probability of n hitting any finite level H in finite time is strictly positive. Models with this feature are ubiquitous in the literature (see Arnsdorf and Halperin 2008, Bayraktar and Yang 2009, Berndt et al 2005, Carr and Linetsky 2006, Cont and Jessen 2011, Ding et al 2009, Duffie and Garleanu 2001, Eckner 2009, Errais et al 2010, Feldhütter 2007, Fouque et al 2009, Jarrow et al 2005, Longstaff and Rajan 2008, Mortensen 2006, Pan and Singleton 2008, Papageorgiou and Sircar 2007, and many others).…”
Section: Conventional Acceptance/rejection Schemementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Gaussian copula models (Schönbucher 2003; Li 2000; Vasicek 1987) separate the modeling of the interdependence of random variables from the modeling of their marginal distributions. Dynamic models include Papageorgiou and Sircar (2007) and Fouque, Sircar, and Solna (2009), which put more of an emphasis on matching the marginals and default distribution of single names.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A necessary and sufficient condition for positive definiteness is therefore (1 − ρ) N + ρ > 0, which leads to the first condition in (15).…”
Section: A Restrictions On Common Correlation Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditions (15) guarantee that the Brownian motions have a legitimate correlation structure (in other words that we have a positive definite covariance matrix), and are derived in Appendix A (see also [15]). Under this assumption, we have that…”
Section: Symmetric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%