2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-004-0190-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multinationals and regional indigenous development

Abstract: F23, R11, R12,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus MNE clusters do not necessarily generate a local LE cluster. These results are broadly consistent with those of Barrios et al (2002), but less so with Barrios et al (2003) who find that MNEs have had an impact on the location choices of LEs 22…”
Section: Development Of Clusterssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Thus MNE clusters do not necessarily generate a local LE cluster. These results are broadly consistent with those of Barrios et al (2002), but less so with Barrios et al (2003) who find that MNEs have had an impact on the location choices of LEs 22…”
Section: Development Of Clusterssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Forfás defines foreign plants as plants where 50 per cent or more of the shares are owned by foreign shareholders. While, arguably, plants with lower foreign ownership could possibly still be considered foreign owned, this is not necessarily a problem for the case of Ireland since almost all foreign direct investment has corresponded to Greenfield investment rather than acquisition of local 4 In recent contributions, Barrios et al (2005b and2006) show that foreign presence has induced indigenous plant entry within the same regions and in neighbouring regions in Ireland.…”
Section: Section Ii: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%