2019
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2018.2837009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective Dynamic Voltage Restorer With Modified EPLL Control and Optimized PI-Controller Gains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PSO was used in [8] to control the operation of switched capacitors for voltage balancing. Furthermore, PSO was used to tune proportional–integral (PI) controllers in different power applications such as dynamic voltage restorer control [9] and PWM controller for inverters to improve the voltage unbalance factor (VUF) [10].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSO was used in [8] to control the operation of switched capacitors for voltage balancing. Furthermore, PSO was used to tune proportional–integral (PI) controllers in different power applications such as dynamic voltage restorer control [9] and PWM controller for inverters to improve the voltage unbalance factor (VUF) [10].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathak et al [16] developed a renewable wind-hydro system to demonstrate a least-mean-square with reweighted control approach for solutions in power quality. Naidu et al [17][18] discussed a modified enhanced phase-locked loop and sliding mode observer control algorithm for a dynamic voltage restorer with optimization of proportionalintegral (PI) gains using particle swarm optimization (PSO) and Harris Hawks optimization algorithms for problems in power quality. The ant colony algorithm was explored for studying ant behavior for optimizing and solving the traveling salesman problem in Ref.…”
Section: India Ranks Fourth On the Renewable Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already explained in (11)- (18), fundamental reactive load current weight can also be computed in the same manner. The reactive component w qa , weight of FCI for 'a' phase is expressed as…”
Section: Fundamental Reactive Load Current Weightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous control techniques described in text like instantaneous reactive power theory (IRPT) [12], least mean square (LMS) [13], synchronous reference frame (SRF) [14], least mean fourth (LMF) [15], fixed forward prediction (FFP) [16], hyperbolic tangent function (HTF) [17], and enhanced phase-locked loop (EPLL) [18]. SRF has complicated computations with poor dynamic response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%