2020
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2020.2979122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control Using Novel Delay Compensation Technique for PMSM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…+ ω e (k)ψ f (5) where L represents the actual inductance of SPMSM during operation, ψ f represents the actual flux linkage of permanent magnet.…”
Section: B Conventional Predictive Model Of Dpccmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…+ ω e (k)ψ f (5) where L represents the actual inductance of SPMSM during operation, ψ f represents the actual flux linkage of permanent magnet.…”
Section: B Conventional Predictive Model Of Dpccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The novel delay compensation scheme was composed of two sequential procedures. The torque ripple was decreased by 8% after compensation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Permanent magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) has been widely used in the field of high-performance power transmission and renewable energy generation [1] owing to the advantages of simple structure, reliable operation, high power density and high efficiency. Different control algorithms of PMSM are studied for achieving different control objectives, such as field oriented control (FOC) [2], direct torque control (DTC) [3,4], fuzzy control [5], nonlinear control [6] and model predictive control (MPC) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the previous limitations, practical implementations of FCS-MPCs often use a short prediction horizon. Frequently, a one-sample [15]- [20] prediction is selected. The one-sample prediction is often modified [19], [20] to compensate for the effect of the computational delay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%