2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1833-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiparameter MRI assessment of normal-appearing and diseased vertebral bone marrow

Abstract: All parameters exhibit significant differences between normal-appearing vBM and the lesions. However, only the ADCs determined with the DW-ssTSE differed significantly between osteoporotic fractures and malignant lesions, potentially allowing for a differential diagnosis of these two entities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous studies, DW-EPI showed more susceptibility heterogeneities, resulting in distortion artifacts, than DW single-shot TSE [10]. The ADCs of osteoporotic and malignant fractures using DW-EPI did not differ significantly, whereas the ADCs of osteoporotic and malignant fractures determined with DW single-shot TSE differed significantly but showed a large overlap.…”
Section: Geith Et Alsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As in previous studies, DW-EPI showed more susceptibility heterogeneities, resulting in distortion artifacts, than DW single-shot TSE [10]. The ADCs of osteoporotic and malignant fractures using DW-EPI did not differ significantly, whereas the ADCs of osteoporotic and malignant fractures determined with DW single-shot TSE differed significantly but showed a large overlap.…”
Section: Geith Et Alsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…
1083of signal intensities (SIs) on diffusion-weighted (DW) steady-state free-precession (SSFP), echo-planar imaging (EPI), single-shot turbo spin-echo (TSE), and opposed-phase sequences as well as the quantitative measurement of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and the value of quantitative chemical-shift imaging to improve specificity [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Because there have been partially contradicting statements about the value of these techniques and there is still uncertainty whether quantification is really necessary and how it improves specificity,
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biffar et al demonstrated that the use of FLDA to combine ADC and T 2 relaxation times of water in the vertebral bone marrow allowed for increased sensitivity and accuracy in the separation between malignant and benign lesions compared to using each classifier individually [32]. In the present study, a significant correlation between tumor ADC changes and relative tumor growth was found in the control group but not in the therapy group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…A meaningful combined evaluation of tumor morphology and DW-MRI could reduce the individual limitations of each approach, allowing for non-invasive response monitoring during initial treatment. Such a combination is constituted by Fisher's linear discriminant analysis (FLDA) [31], which has been demonstrated to increase the accuracy to separate between malignant and benign lesions in the vertebral bone marrow by incorporating ADC and T 2 relaxation time values compared to using each classifier individually [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FLDA is a statistical method to reduce the dimensionality of data; by finding an optimal linear combination of a given feature set, the differentiation between two (or more) classes can be improved [20][21][22]. FLDA was applied using either two out of three alternately combined parameters or using all three parameters as input.…”
Section: Part 2 -Differentiation Of Arterial and Venous Vesselsmentioning
confidence: 99%