2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiparametric characterization of heterogeneous soft materials using contact point detection-based atomic force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This goal is achieved by measuring the adhesion force on ODT-coated patterned samples using AFM in the pulsed force mode. , Pulsed force AFM allows one to record the force–distance curve as the microscope tip is approaching and is withdrawn from the sample surface. In this way, it is possible to simultaneously collect topographical and NM two-dimensional (2D) maps of the analyzed surface at the nanometer scale. , For these reasons, pulsed force AFM has found many applications in both materials science, , allowing to distinguish between different materials on a given surface (e.g., material recognition in polymer blends), and in biology, , where single protein loop pairs were successfully resolved …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This goal is achieved by measuring the adhesion force on ODT-coated patterned samples using AFM in the pulsed force mode. , Pulsed force AFM allows one to record the force–distance curve as the microscope tip is approaching and is withdrawn from the sample surface. In this way, it is possible to simultaneously collect topographical and NM two-dimensional (2D) maps of the analyzed surface at the nanometer scale. , For these reasons, pulsed force AFM has found many applications in both materials science, , allowing to distinguish between different materials on a given surface (e.g., material recognition in polymer blends), and in biology, , where single protein loop pairs were successfully resolved …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the structures studied here were too thin (<2 nm) for extraction of quantitative stiffness. 31 In addition, extraction of quantitative stiffness values using PFT requires careful calibration of many parameters and meeting some frequency requirements. 32 For the adhesion map, the quantitative values depend on the chemistry of the tip, which varies over time due to adsorption of hydrophobic molecules or fibrils.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stiffness and adhesion maps shown here can only be used for qualitative interpretation and for distinguishing between different structures. Most of the structures studied here were too thin (<2 nm) for extraction of quantitative stiffness . In addition, extraction of quantitative stiffness values using PFT requires careful calibration of many parameters and meeting some frequency requirements .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid atomic force microscopy (AFM) nanoindentation measurements give tip‐sample interaction curve at each point of the investigated area with a good resolution. Analysis of these data, in addition to the surface topography, gives a contrast of adhesion, stiffness (elastic modulus) of inhomogeneous polymers (Bahrami et al, 2015; Dokukin & Sokolov, 2012; Kaimaki, Smith, & Durkan, 2018; Schön et al, 2011; Yang, Chen, Ding, Liao, & Hwang, 2020; Young et al, 2011), filled rubbers (Cobani et al, 2019; Ohashi, Sato, Nakajima, Junkong, & Ikeda, 2018; Qu et al, 2011; including the stretched state (Morozov, Izumov, & Garishin, 2018) and the vicinity of defects and cracks (Morozov, 2016)), biological objects (Alsteens, Müller, & Dufrêne, 2017; Krieg et al, 2019), coatings (Morozov, Kamenetskikh, Beliaev, Scherban, & Kiselkov, 2020; Wei et al, 2020), and many other materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%