2018
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.5254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasoundguided cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate: Clinically significant cancer detection rates stratified by the Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 assessment categories

Abstract: Cognitive fusion MRI-TRUS-guided targeted biopsy yielded substantially lower rates of clinically significant cancer in PI-RADS v2 score 4 and 5 lesions when compared to published results using in-bore MR-guided or automated MRI-TRUS fusion guidance systems. Cancer detection was worst for TZ lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kasivisvanathan et al stated that MRI-guided biopsies diagnosed more csPCa than SB, and the ratio of csPCa missed by MRI-guided biopsy but diagnosed by additional was 13% (21). John et al performed CTB and concomitant SB in 131 men; 17.6% of the clinically significant cancers were detected with CTB only, and 8.4% were detected with SB only (22). In the current study, the csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in SB compared to CTB; 35% of the significant cancers would be missed without SB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…Kasivisvanathan et al stated that MRI-guided biopsies diagnosed more csPCa than SB, and the ratio of csPCa missed by MRI-guided biopsy but diagnosed by additional was 13% (21). John et al performed CTB and concomitant SB in 131 men; 17.6% of the clinically significant cancers were detected with CTB only, and 8.4% were detected with SB only (22). In the current study, the csPCa detection rate was significantly higher in SB compared to CTB; 35% of the significant cancers would be missed without SB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…A recent study reported that the overall sPCa detection rate in TB was 32% and the sPCa detection rates for PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 11.0%, 42.9%, and 35.6%, respectively. 13 In a 2014 study, Sonn et al. 14 reported the overall sPCa detection rate in patients who underwent TB as 24%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, an alternative clinical approach is to begin with mpMRI to determine which patients need a targeted biopsy (21,22). The detection rate of csPCa is directly related to the PI-RADS score (Table II) (11,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and the results depend on clinical parameters, the number of previous negative biopsies and the quality of TPBx procedures; in a previous series, we reported a percentage of missed csPCa equal to 8.7 versus 23.5 versus 16.2 versus 0% in the presence of a PI-RAS score <3 versus 3 versus 4 versus 5 in patients that were diagnosed by transperineal SPBx (11). In addition, it is still unclear when and which mpMRI lesions negative for cancer should be submitted early to repeat TPBx; in this respect, about 15-20% of PI-RADS 3 could harbour a csPCa resulting in reclassification to PIRADS score 4 in a year (24,25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it is still unclear when and which mpMRI lesions negative for cancer should be submitted early to repeat TPBx; in this respect, about 15-20% of PI-RADS 3 could harbour a csPCa resulting in reclassification to PIRADS score 4 in a year (24,25). On the other hand, the detection rate of csPCa in the presence of PI-RADS score 5 versus 4 is extremely variable ranging from 35.6-100% (11,26) to 34-62.7% (23)(24)(25)(26)(27) of the cases, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%