1999
DOI: 10.1109/25.752558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multipath performance of adaptive antennas with multiple interferers and correlated fadings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that these bounds are generally tighter than those of [5]. Moreover, we extend the approaches in [7] and obtain new closed-form approximations of the SEP that do not require Monte Carlo simulation and are close to simulation results.…”
Section: Bounds and Approximations For Optimum Combining Of Signals Imentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We show that these bounds are generally tighter than those of [5]. Moreover, we extend the approaches in [7] and obtain new closed-form approximations of the SEP that do not require Monte Carlo simulation and are close to simulation results.…”
Section: Bounds and Approximations For Optimum Combining Of Signals Imentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, the results are limited to the case of BPSK and no thermal noise. Approximations for the BEP have been presented in [7] and [8] for binary modulation in the presence of thermal noise. However, the approximation of [7] still requires Monte Carlo simulation to derive mean eigenvalues (a table is provided in [7] for some cases), and the approximation of [8] is valid only for the case when the number of interferers is less than the number of antenna elements.…”
Section: Bounds and Approximations For Optimum Combining Of Signals Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such methods have been put to good use in communication-theoretic literature, see, for example, [33], [34]. We have found that a sample size of = 5000 is sufficient to compute the moments accurately enough for our analysis.…”
Section: A Statistical Model For Eesmmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…whereλ m,t = E[λ m,t ] andλ m,t can be found via closed-form solutions (in some special cases) or Monte Carlo simulations as discussed in [32].…”
Section: A Probability Of Error In Each Layermentioning
confidence: 99%