1980
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(80)80136-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiphase reactors : mass transfer and modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a reactor model, apart from the detailed and consistent kinetic model like the present one, requires appropriate representation of the flow and mixing and providing values for the gas hold-up, interfacial area and the liquid phase mass transfer coefficient for the specified sparging and/or agitation device configuration. This could be done preferably by experimental cold flow studies, such as the one conducted by Andrigo et al [13] on the specific reactor used, or in the absence of experimental data, by using appropriate published correlations for the said hydrodynamic and transport parameters [23][24][25][26] or by the use of computational fluid dynamic modeling tools [27]. Despite well-known and sometimes justifiable reservations against the use of generalized correlations, the advantage of obtaining a quick and practical estimate of these parameters cannot be overemphasized.…”
Section: Predicted Product Distribution At the Exit Of A Continuous Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a reactor model, apart from the detailed and consistent kinetic model like the present one, requires appropriate representation of the flow and mixing and providing values for the gas hold-up, interfacial area and the liquid phase mass transfer coefficient for the specified sparging and/or agitation device configuration. This could be done preferably by experimental cold flow studies, such as the one conducted by Andrigo et al [13] on the specific reactor used, or in the absence of experimental data, by using appropriate published correlations for the said hydrodynamic and transport parameters [23][24][25][26] or by the use of computational fluid dynamic modeling tools [27]. Despite well-known and sometimes justifiable reservations against the use of generalized correlations, the advantage of obtaining a quick and practical estimate of these parameters cannot be overemphasized.…”
Section: Predicted Product Distribution At the Exit Of A Continuous Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All parameters except the last one have been obtained from the relevant literature. The mass transfer coefficients are determined using Calderbank's correlation . Diffusion coefficients are evaluated using the Wilke‐Chang correlation and interfacial area is found using the correlation given by Starks .…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (18)(19)(20) and (17) form a system of differential algebraic equations (DAEs). This system of DAEs are solved using DAE solver ode 15s in MATLAB.…”
Section: Equilibrium Based Model Neglecting Diffusional Resistancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Surface tension forces, which are thought to determine the hydrodynamics of flow in trickleflow reactors with small packings, stabilize the stratified flow structures in capillaries of small internal diameter ( < l mm). Landeghem, 1980;Herskowitz and Smith, 1983). In recent times, the catalyst dimensions in trickle-flow reactors have been Model Development reduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%