1983
DOI: 10.1063/1.445483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiphoton NMR spectroscopy on a spin system with I=1/2

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inOn the theory of double quantum NMR in polymer systems: The second cumulant approximation for many spin I = 1/2 systems J. Chem. Phys. 139, 194905 (2013); 10.1063/1.4830410 Determination of spin Hamiltonians from projected single reference configuration interaction calculations. I. Spin 1/2 systems J. Chem. Phys. 133, 044106 (2010); 10.1063/1.3458642Electron spin echo envelope modulation spectroscopy on orientationally disordered systems: Line shape singularities in S=1/2, I=1/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As follows clearly from the comparison of expressions (23), (24) decreases with number of photons [10,19,25], the intensity of the resonance signal diminishes quickly with number of the mode. A peculiarity of the excitation scheme proposed in the present paper is that, along with multiphoton transitions, there are direct transitions between dressed spin states with (n − m) > 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As follows clearly from the comparison of expressions (23), (24) decreases with number of photons [10,19,25], the intensity of the resonance signal diminishes quickly with number of the mode. A peculiarity of the excitation scheme proposed in the present paper is that, along with multiphoton transitions, there are direct transitions between dressed spin states with (n − m) > 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…where ε α = α (ω e − Ω) , b αβ m−n = b m−n are the Fourier coefficients determined in (10). The first term in (32) is diagonal, while the second one is off-diagonal.…”
Section: Floquet Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations