2017
DOI: 10.3390/ma10080962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiphysics Simulation of Low-Amplitude Acoustic Wave Detection by Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors Validated by In-Situ AE-Fatigue Experiment

Abstract: Piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) are commonly used for detecting Lamb waves for structural health monitoring application. However, in most applications of active sensing, the signals are of high-amplitude and easy to detect. In this article, we have shown a new avenue of using the PWAS transducer for detecting the low-amplitude fatigue-crack related acoustic emission (AE) signals. Multiphysics finite element (FE) simulations were performed with two PWAS transducers bonded to the structure. Various con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When increasing the dimensions of the test specimens and introducing multiple crack formations from four‐point bending tests, acoustic emission signals can increasingly be drowned in noise or characteristics of the often‐used acoustic emission parameters (energy, frequency) are even more changed than for, e.g., lab‐scale beams . Thus, if the distance between the acoustic source and the sensor placement increases, the signal becomes significantly weaker due to geometric spreading . Additionally, localization becomes progressively more complex due to the increasing migration of microcracks.…”
Section: Techniques To Study the Trigger Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When increasing the dimensions of the test specimens and introducing multiple crack formations from four‐point bending tests, acoustic emission signals can increasingly be drowned in noise or characteristics of the often‐used acoustic emission parameters (energy, frequency) are even more changed than for, e.g., lab‐scale beams . Thus, if the distance between the acoustic source and the sensor placement increases, the signal becomes significantly weaker due to geometric spreading . Additionally, localization becomes progressively more complex due to the increasing migration of microcracks.…”
Section: Techniques To Study the Trigger Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different transducer types are suitable for various ultrasonic guided wave applications. Excitation or reception components can be piezoelectric wafers [7,8], shear-horizontal transducers [9,10], polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) transducers [11], air-coupled transducers [12,13], pulsedlaser [14] and laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) [15]. The patterns for transducer distribution vary from sparse array [16] to densely distributed arrays [17,18], and full-aperture array [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Signals measured by various types of ultrasonic sensors can be converted to diagnostic results. [4][5][6][7][8][9] One category of ultrasonic damage diagnostic methods directly creates the results as damage indices or images. A damage index can be defined in various manners 10,11 for monitoring a path between a pair of sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Signals measured by various types of ultrasonic sensors can be converted to diagnostic results. 49…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%