2023
DOI: 10.1177/21677026231170563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Adaptive Attention-Bias-Modification Programs to Alter Normative Increase in the Error-Related Negativity in Adolescents

Abstract: In the current article, we examined the impact of two home-delivered attentional-bias-modification (ABM) programs on a biomarker of anxiety (i.e., the error-related negativity [ERN]). The ERN is sensitivity to ABM-related changes; however, it is unclear whether ABM exerts its influence on the ERN and anxiety by increasing general attentional control or by disengaging spatial allocation of attention. In this study, we measured the ERN, anxiety, attention bias, and attention control before and after two versions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 97 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study utilized data collected during the second visit of a multisite longitudinal project that investigated the effects of an adaptive attention bias modification (AABM) program on anxiety and error‐related negativity (ERN) in a large sample of adolescents (R01MH106477); the primary aims for this project are reported elsewhere (Amir et al, 2022). Of this larger sample, a total of 127 participants completed the monetary incentive delay (MID) task described in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study utilized data collected during the second visit of a multisite longitudinal project that investigated the effects of an adaptive attention bias modification (AABM) program on anxiety and error‐related negativity (ERN) in a large sample of adolescents (R01MH106477); the primary aims for this project are reported elsewhere (Amir et al, 2022). Of this larger sample, a total of 127 participants completed the monetary incentive delay (MID) task described in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%