2013
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple and differentiated contributions to the male gene pool of pastoral and farmer populations of the African Sahel

Abstract: The African Sahel is conducive to studies of divergence/admixture genetic events as a result of its population history being so closely related with past climatic changes. Today, it is a place of the co-existence of two differing food-producing subsistence systems, i.e., that of sedentary farmers and nomadic pastoralists, whose populations have likely been formed from several dispersed indigenous hunter-gatherer groups. Using new methodology, we show here that the male gene pool of the extant populations of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
21
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, phylogeography of both these lineages suggests that contemporary Sahelian pastoralists share genetic characteristics with populations of western rather than eastern Mediterranean ancestry, contrarily to what could be expected with a cattle domestication centre in the Near East. It can be added that a north African contribution of NRY markers to the Fulani pastoralists’ gene pool was also documented previously through a study of NRY haplogroups’ frequency distributions in wide African data sets . Last but not least, similar age estimates to those inferred for west Eurasian mtDNA haplogroups, that is, around 8000 years ago, were obtained by analysing the NRY lineage R1b‐V88, which is again more frequent in the nomadic pastoralists across the Sahel, although not only in the Fulani population …”
Section: Genetic Evidence On Sahelian Populationssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, phylogeography of both these lineages suggests that contemporary Sahelian pastoralists share genetic characteristics with populations of western rather than eastern Mediterranean ancestry, contrarily to what could be expected with a cattle domestication centre in the Near East. It can be added that a north African contribution of NRY markers to the Fulani pastoralists’ gene pool was also documented previously through a study of NRY haplogroups’ frequency distributions in wide African data sets . Last but not least, similar age estimates to those inferred for west Eurasian mtDNA haplogroups, that is, around 8000 years ago, were obtained by analysing the NRY lineage R1b‐V88, which is again more frequent in the nomadic pastoralists across the Sahel, although not only in the Fulani population …”
Section: Genetic Evidence On Sahelian Populationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It can be added that a north African contribution of NRY markers to the Fulani pastoralists' gene pool was also documented previously through a study of NRY haplogroups' frequency distributions in wide African data sets. 68 Last but not least, similar age estimates to those inferred for west Eurasian mtDNA haplogroups, that is, around 8000 years ago, were obtained by analysing the NRY lineage R1b-V88, which is again more frequent in the nomadic pastoralists across the Sahel, although not only in the Fulani population. 69 The African Sahel also likely received recent genetic inputs from the Arabian Peninsula.…”
Section: Uniparental Mtdna and Nry Markerssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Uniparental genetic markers provide rather contradictory evidence for these linguistic proposals; while the mtDNA L3f3 clade supports Blench's vision (Černý et al, 2009), the Y chromosome R1b1a-V88 clade favors Ehret's concept (Cruciani et al, 2010a). However, recently analyzed male genetic contributions of the LCB populations showed a significant North African R1b contribution only in the Fulani pastoralists belonging to the Niger-Congo linguistic family and not to the Chadic groups (Bučková et al, 2013). It seems thus that LCB Y chromosomal variation is still difficult to interpret, likely because of its higher susceptibility to genetic drift than that of mtDNA (Pereira et al, 2001a) or due to insufficient sampling in as large a region as is the LCB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%