Multiple attribute decision-making methods for the dynamic operator allocation problem

Yang, Taho; Chen, Mu-Chen; Hung, Chih-Ching

doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2006.04.002

Cited by 73 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The aim of the MCDM is to obtain the optimum choice that has the highest degree of satisfaction for all of the relevant attributes (Yang, Chen & Hung, 2007). In the analyses, FAHP known to be as the MCDM method is used for determining the weights of the strategic performance measures.…”

Section: Data Set and Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategic Financial Performance Evaluation of the Turkish Companies Traded on ISE

Bayrakdaroğlu¹,

Yalçın²

2012

eab

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Strategic financial performance evaluation has been more important in a highly competitive environment. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the Turkish industrial companies traded on Istanbul Stock Exchange 30 (ISE-30) with respect to seven strategic financial performance measures by using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and VIKOR (VI_ sekriterijumsko KOmpromisno Rangiranje) method which are known as Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods.

show abstract

Section: Data Set and Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategic Financial Performance Evaluation of the Turkish Companies Traded on ISE

Bayrakdaroğlu¹,

Yalçın²

2012

eab

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Then, the decision-making matrix D can be processed to rank the alternatives according to the step of the TOPSIS method. For more information of the decision-making steps of the TOPSIS method, please refer to relevant literature (Hwang and Yoon, 1981;Liu et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2007) …”

Section: Assessment and Prioritization Of The Alternativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4a), the decision-making matrix for TOPSIS analysis can be gotten. According to The bold values will be referred by Tables V and VII. CR means the consistency ratio, which is much smaller than the commonly accepted critical value of 0.1. the decision-making process of TOPSIS (Hwang and Yoon, 1981;Liu et al, 2006;Yang et al, 2007), the calculation of solving the optimal solution can be carried out through the following steps:…”

Section: Ranking Order Of All Alternativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment and prioritization of eco‐revetment projects in urban rivers

Ruihua

2008

River Research & Apps

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ecological revetment for slope protection in urban rivers requires consideration of economic and ecological aspects and also of social aspects including recreation. Taking the Hunhe River as an example, our study established an evaluation system and a decision-making method for evaluating and prioritizing the eco-revetment projects. The Delphi method was used for collecting the opinions of experts, which include the relative importance of the indicators and the relative preference of the alternatives. The former was surveyed by pair comparison and processed applied analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The latter was described via linguistic variables, which need to be changed into the quantitative values for TOPSIS analysis. For that reason, we introduced the fuzzy set theory and established a fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method based on TOPSIS to assess and prioritize the projects. The evaluation system includes economic, social, environment and ecological several aspects totalling eight indicators. The evaluating and prioritizing result of the projects shows that the three-dimensional vegetation net is the best slope protection measures in the study area. The sensitivity analyses of indicator weights and different calculation methods were performed to demonstrate the reliability of the results. The sensitivity analyses indicate that construction cost and maintenance cost are dominant factors during the alternatives prioritization. The distance calculation method and normalization technique are insensitive to the prioritization results. The methodology proposed by this paper offers an effective and feasible tool for managers to evaluate and choose the optimal engineering measures of riverbank protection.

show abstract

“…For example, to determine the most efficient number of operators in a cellular manufacturing system, simulation and Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is applied [4], to ascertain the optimal staffing level of a labor-intensive manufacturing system by applying simulation, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), TOPSIS and fuzzy-based logic [5] and fuzzy-DEA, fuzzy C-means and simulation are used to identify the optimal operator allocation [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Operators‘ Evaluation and Allocation in SME‘s Food Manufacturing Company Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Computer Simulation

Rani¹,

Ismail²,

Rahman³

2014

IJAPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-This paper presents the applications of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and computer simulation within the context of operators' evaluation and allocation. AHP can be used to evaluate the performance of operators while computer simulation can be applied in analyzing the impact of production system performance if the operators' performance is included in the operator allocation decision. The combination of the methods used in this study, improve the flexibility of the operator allocation decision. The results of the study are compared. It is found that operator allocation decision with the consideration of operators' performance will affect the performance of the production system and outperform the current operator allocation decision.

show abstract

Multiple attribute decision-making methods for the dynamic operator allocation problem

Cited by 73 publications

References 17 publications

Strategic Financial Performance Evaluation of the Turkish Companies Traded on ISE

Strategic Financial Performance Evaluation of the Turkish Companies Traded on ISE

Assessment and prioritization of eco‐revetment projects in urban rivers

Operators‘ Evaluation and Allocation in SME‘s Food Manufacturing Company Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Computer Simulation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About