2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-022-10208-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple attributes group decision-making based on trigonometric operators, particle swarm optimization and complex intuitionistic fuzzy values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this segment, we bring in some fundamental theories associated to FSs [44,47,48], TFN, similarity measure and distance measure used in the study. [60] and Zhao and Zhang [61].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this segment, we bring in some fundamental theories associated to FSs [44,47,48], TFN, similarity measure and distance measure used in the study. [60] and Zhao and Zhang [61].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzziness characterisation and quantification are critical concerns that influence the management of uncertainty in many information systems and concepts. Biswas et al [ 11 ] proposed a new multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework with spherical fuzzy numbers, trigonometric operators [ 47 ], picture fuzzy number [ 10 , 12 ] and Fermatean fuzzy information [ 13 ]. Pamucar et al [ 44 ] developed a novel decision-making approach using Measuring attractiveness through a categorical-based evaluation technique (MACBETH) and a new combinative distance-based assessment method to address the supplier selection problem during the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For group decision-making problems, hesitant fuzzy set, complex intuitionistic fuzzy set, and probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set have been introduced to handle and model the uncertainty and vagueness in decision-making very effectively, reflect the importance of different numerical values more clearly, elicit the decision makers' knowledge, and develop more effective decision-making model. [16][17][18] Rani and Garg [16] proposed a novel algorithm for multiattribute group decision-making using complex intuitionistic fuzzy values. Jin et al [17] proposed a decision-making model using probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference relations for reflecting clearly the importance of different numerical values and eliciting the decision makers' knowledge in the group decision-making problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is generally delineated as an analytical process for making the most suitable choice with the highest relative dominance out of a group of candidate alternatives characterized by multiple performance criteria (Jaini 2023 ; Kaya et al 2022 ; Shen et al 2022 ). To tackle and manage real-world decision issues, numerous MCDA models, approaches, and techniques have been created and applied in a variety of application domains (Garg and Rani 2022 ; Rani and Garg 2022 ; Reig-Mullor et al 2022 ; Tiwari and Gupta 2022 ). Many MCDA systems employ a step-by-step evaluation process that entails gathering pertinent information, identifying potential alternatives, and assessing workable solutions to aid decision-makers in making more deliberate and meaningful decisions (Chen 2022a , b ; Tsao and Chen 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%