2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple autonomous surface vehicle motion planning for cooperative range-based underwater target localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, robots can be classified by the environment they are in and by the application field for which they are designed [114] (see Fig.6), so the following reviewed works use different types of robots. Important features of autonomous robotic systems are autonomy [115] and cooperative motion planning [116].…”
Section: Urban Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, robots can be classified by the environment they are in and by the application field for which they are designed [114] (see Fig.6), so the following reviewed works use different types of robots. Important features of autonomous robotic systems are autonomy [115] and cooperative motion planning [116].…”
Section: Urban Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masmitja et al [6] presented a complete study to derive the optimal path to conduct by a surface vehicle in a range-only and single-beacon target localization scenario. Further in [17], Crasta et al extended the path optimisation problem for underwater target tracking using multiple trackers. Whereas all these works have been conducted for the ROTT methods, some of the results derived can also be applied in the AOTT.…”
Section: A Optimal Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing sensor network location schemes could be divided into two groups [26]: range-based and range-free. Rang-based methods need to obtain the distance between the unknown node and the adjacent known node [27]. Typical techniques mainly include Time of Arrival (TOA) [28], Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA) [29], Angle of Arrival (AOA) [30], and Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) [31].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%