2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.053
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Biomarkers at Admission Significantly Improve the Prediction of Mortality in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Our data suggest that addition of a multimarker to a model including established risk factors improves the prediction of mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Furthermore, the use of a simple risk score based on these biomarkers identifies a high-risk subgroup.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
62
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed scoring method is not widely accepted, although there are studies involving a similar method for patients with acute coronary syndrome. 31 When all scores were set uniformly as 0, 1, or 2 in every degree of severity, C-indices of this scoring method for predicting allcause mortality (0.825 and 0.828, respectively) and cardiovascular mortality (0.773 and 0.778, respectively) were similar to the current scoring method (data not shown). Further research is necessary to develop an optimal scoring method.…”
Section: Disclosuresmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The proposed scoring method is not widely accepted, although there are studies involving a similar method for patients with acute coronary syndrome. 31 When all scores were set uniformly as 0, 1, or 2 in every degree of severity, C-indices of this scoring method for predicting allcause mortality (0.825 and 0.828, respectively) and cardiovascular mortality (0.773 and 0.778, respectively) were similar to the current scoring method (data not shown). Further research is necessary to develop an optimal scoring method.…”
Section: Disclosuresmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The clinical significance of renal function and NT-proBNP measurement for prognosis for patients with CVD has been investigated by many prior studies; however, the findings of these studies only reflect the predictive value of NT-proBNP level and renal function for clinical prognosis [4,9,23,24]. In contrast, this study focused on evaluating different effects and optimal NT-proBNP cut-off values for prognostic prediction in CAD patients with various eGFRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] Notably, the impairment in reference vessel CFVR resulted primarily from a low hyperemic APV in the presence of high hyperemic microvascular resistance, in combination with a high baseline APV in the presence of a low baseline microvascular resistance in patients with an abnormal reference vessel CFVR (Table 3).…”
Section: Clinical and Procedural Characteristics According To Referenmentioning
confidence: 99%