2009
DOI: 10.17487/rfc5648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Care-of Addresses Registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, there are many researches for new architectures to support the Routing Optimization RO in Mobile Networks that happens once the MR/MNN change among different access networks. In Nested NEMO, the sub-optimal routing issues are increased because the number of MRs and its MNNs attached to mobile networks and required to maintain connection with their home networks [12][13]. According to the proposed MROM scheme, optimal routing path can obtain by managing connectivity of the mobile networks (i.e.…”
Section: Proposed Mrom Scheme Based Routing Optimization (Ro)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there are many researches for new architectures to support the Routing Optimization RO in Mobile Networks that happens once the MR/MNN change among different access networks. In Nested NEMO, the sub-optimal routing issues are increased because the number of MRs and its MNNs attached to mobile networks and required to maintain connection with their home networks [12][13]. According to the proposed MROM scheme, optimal routing path can obtain by managing connectivity of the mobile networks (i.e.…”
Section: Proposed Mrom Scheme Based Routing Optimization (Ro)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, the mobility experience offered by NEMO to vehicle hosts can be improved by enabling the MR to maintain network mobility across multiple interfaces. This feature is integrated in our communications stack by using the multiple care-of addresses registration (MCoA) [25] extensions, thanks to which the HA is aware that the MR is reachable through a set of CoAs.…”
Section: Infrastructure-based Vehicular Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, each time a handover occurs, IKEv2 SAs need to be re-established with the new CoA. To avoid this inefficiency, NEMO and IKEv2 need to cooperate to allow IKEv2 SAs to be simply updated with the new configured CoAs [25] and avoid the costly SA renegotiation process. Given that current software implementations lack such interoperation, we have developed an interprocess communication between NEMO and IKEv2 daemons to allow the former to keep the latter informed about new configured CoAs.…”
Section: Evaluation Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%