1989
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.1.1.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants.

Abstract: The 35S promoter is a major promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus that infects crucifers. This promoter is still active when excised from cauliflower mosaic virus and integrated into the nuclear genome of transgenic tobacco. Previous work has shown that the -343 to -46 upstream fragment is responsible for the majority of the 35S promoter strength (Odell, J.T., Nagy, F., and Chua, N.-H. [1985]. Nature 313, 810-812). Here we show by 5', 3', and internal deletions that this upstream fragment can be subdivided … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the repressive element was unable to suppress the activity of 35S enhancer in vegetative tissues [10,43]. In our study, the vegetative activity of the longer 351-bp 35S enhancer fragment (-396 to -46) that is responsible for the majority of the 35S promoter strength [33] could be suppressed by the repressive element of NtAGI-1, showing a potential of the repressive element in the design of synthetic reproductive promoters.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the repressive element was unable to suppress the activity of 35S enhancer in vegetative tissues [10,43]. In our study, the vegetative activity of the longer 351-bp 35S enhancer fragment (-396 to -46) that is responsible for the majority of the 35S promoter strength [33] could be suppressed by the repressive element of NtAGI-1, showing a potential of the repressive element in the design of synthetic reproductive promoters.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…To increase the promoter activity, we added 35S enhancer fragment (-396 to -46) [32,33] to the 5 'end of NtAGIP1, and generated 35SNtAGIP1 promoter ( Fig 1A). Then, NtAGIP1 and 35SNtAGIP1 were fused to the GUS coding region to create NtAGIP1::GUS and 35SNtAGIP1:: GUS fusions ( Fig 1A).…”
Section: Adding 35s Enhancer To Ntagip1 Broadens the Tissue Specificimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full 343 bp segment was therefore designated the 'CaMV 35S promoter', while the 46 bp segment was considered as the so-called 'minimal promoter' 29 . In follow-up studies, these 343 bp could then be further subdivided into several individual stretches, which would promote expression in different cell types or tissues, in either an additive or combinatorial fashion 30,31 . Based on these groundbreaking findings, numerous versions of the promoter emerged over the course of the following years; for example, simply placing two CaMV35S promoters in a tandem led to enhanced strength of the expression system 32 .…”
Section: The Camv 35s Promoter (1985-2000)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 90-35S promoter, containing a normal TATA-box and an ASF1 transcription factor-binding site (30), displayed a very low level of promoter activity in transgenic tobacco leaves. The transformants harboring the N1 construct, containing the sequence between –1415 and –115 of the PNZIP promoter, exhibited high GUS activity, not only in leaves but also in roots.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%