1986
DOI: 10.4135/9781412985185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
56
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of multiple testing [14] is closely related to overfitting. Standard statistical tests assume that only one hypothesis is being tested, but modern learners can easily test millions before they are done.…”
Section: Overfitting Has Many Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of multiple testing [14] is closely related to overfitting. Standard statistical tests assume that only one hypothesis is being tested, but modern learners can easily test millions before they are done.…”
Section: Overfitting Has Many Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in each treatment (combinations of GA 3 and CS treatment) the germination percentage data as well as MGT data of the three provenances were analysed by one-way ANOVA. The means were compared using the Duncan test (Klockars and Sax, 1986). All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., USA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, both the comparison between ecotype groups and that among landrace provenance groups held the average mean square of entries within groups as the error term . Given the unequal group sample sizes, type III sum of squares (Freund et al ., 1986) were used for mean Table 1 Tukey's HSD test (Klockars & Sax, 1986) . The other comparisons were tested on the experiment error.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%