2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2003.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple connections link FAK to cell motility and invasion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
308
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
15
308
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Likely, the effects of focal adhesion signaling and GPCR signaling on ERK activation are additive in the in vivo setting of labor as illustrated in Figure 6. In this model, consistent with the results presented here, stretch-induced integrin clustering can lead to FAK phosphorylation [Schlaepfer and Mitra, 2004], creating docking sites for Src and paxillin. Furthermore, activated Src facilitates the maximal FAK activation through further phosphorylation of FAK [Schlaepfer and Mitra, 2004].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likely, the effects of focal adhesion signaling and GPCR signaling on ERK activation are additive in the in vivo setting of labor as illustrated in Figure 6. In this model, consistent with the results presented here, stretch-induced integrin clustering can lead to FAK phosphorylation [Schlaepfer and Mitra, 2004], creating docking sites for Src and paxillin. Furthermore, activated Src facilitates the maximal FAK activation through further phosphorylation of FAK [Schlaepfer and Mitra, 2004].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, integrin engagement and v-Src involvement have been demonstrated in non-muscle cells such as rat embryo fibroblasts to promote cell motility [Fincham et al, 2000]. Integrin engagement in non-muscle cells is known to lead to the activation of a variety of intracellular signaling events via recruitment of signaling molecules to focal adhesion sites [Schlaepfer and Mitra, 2004].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kragtorp and Miller (2006) have found that inhibition of Ena/ VASP or FAK leads to abnormal somite rotation and failure to form intersomitic boundaries. Ena/VASP proteins appear to act as a molecular link between cell-surface integrins and the actin cytoskeleton to orchestrate changes in adhesive strength and cell motility (Schlaepfer and Mitra, 2004). Another potential mechanism by which these proteins might regulate cell motility is through activation of integrin adhesion and fibronectin matrix assembly (Kragtorp and Miller, 2006).…”
Section: Local Quantitative Framework Of the Somite Microenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 FAK also regulates the cycle of focal contact formation and disassembly required for efficient cell movement and thus, mucosal restitution. 9 Levels of FAK protein expression and/or activation have been correlated to phenotypic changes that affect cell differentiation and function, notably adhesion and migration, in a number of tissues. 10 -13 Targeted FAK deletion in vascular endothelial cells leads to apoptosis and aberrant cell movement whereas FAK overexpression results in increased angiogenesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%