2020
DOI: 10.1121/10.0000784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple constraint matched field processing tolerant to array tilt mismatch

Abstract: A multiple constraint method (MCM) specifically designed to accommodate the uncertainty of array tilt is developed for matched field processing (MFP). Combining the MCM with the white noise gain constraint method results in a processor that is tolerant to both array tilt and environmental mismatch. Experimental results verify the robustness of the proposed MFP to localize and track a surface ship radiating broadband noise (200–500 Hz), using a 56-m long vertical array with tilt in approximately 100-m deep shal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, beamforming-based target direction estimation algorithms for underwater acoustic arrays can improve the performance of weak signal detection and underwater noise suppression, but the computational complexity of these algorithms needs to be considered. An additional important source of mismatch is the array tilt, which has not received much attention, in spite of its significant impact, especially for a large array tilt observed in shallow environments [14]. Other influential works in this field included Zhu et al and Zhang et al [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, beamforming-based target direction estimation algorithms for underwater acoustic arrays can improve the performance of weak signal detection and underwater noise suppression, but the computational complexity of these algorithms needs to be considered. An additional important source of mismatch is the array tilt, which has not received much attention, in spite of its significant impact, especially for a large array tilt observed in shallow environments [14]. Other influential works in this field included Zhu et al and Zhang et al [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires all the characteristic data of the sound field environment; therefore, it is sensitive to environmental mismatches. Moreover, the uncertainty of the sound field environment significantly affects positioning performance (Bucker, 1976; Tran and Trinh, 2017; Worthmann et al , 2017; Byun et al , 2020). Finally, BF applied in the field of underwater passive localization usually assumes that the received signal is a spherical wave, which has high localization accuracy for near-field hydroacoustic targets (Somasundaram and Parsons, 2011; Somasundaram, 2012; Bi et al , 2017; Yuan et al , 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of them is based on reducing the sensitivity of MFP through the use of a multiply constrained beamformer [8]. This suggests that opening up the search window in one or more of these parameters would make the beamformer more tolerant of uncertainty in the other parameters [6,9,10]. Another well-known approach is based on solving the problem of localization by incorporating environmental variability a priori [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%