2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-criteria decision-making sorting methods: A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
0
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The outranking approach has the highest number of publications, representing 48% of the total publications [33]. This fact demonstrates that this approach is robust and mature for solving sorting problems.…”
Section: Types Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The outranking approach has the highest number of publications, representing 48% of the total publications [33]. This fact demonstrates that this approach is robust and mature for solving sorting problems.…”
Section: Types Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Equation (13) shows by how much an alternative 𝑎 outranks all the other alternatives. On the other hand, (14) expresses by how much an alternative 𝑎 is outranked by all the other alternatives.…”
Section: Prometheementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the number of MCS methods available in the literature, the outranking approach, usually based on ÉLimination et Choix Traduisant la REalité (ELECTRE) and Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) gains the highest number of publications [13], [14], [15], [16]. Among the PROMETHEE-based MCS methods, the FlowSort [17] has been gaining the most attention, due to its most natural extension of the PROMETHEE for sorting problems [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many complex problems benefit from using MCDM, especially those focusing on selecting the best alternative. Choosing the best alternative considers many aspects of a problem; therefore, many real-life problems involve a group of decision-makers [9]. MCDM concept theory is based on the understanding that two reference points are used, i.e., one being a positive ideal solution (PIS) while the other is a negative one, with both being used as benchmarks [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%