Multiple cropping systems as drivers for providing multiple ecosystem services: from concepts to design

Abstract

Provisioning services, such as the production of food, feed, and fiber, have always been the main focus of agriculture. Since the 1950s, intensive cropping systems based on the cultivation of a single crop or a single cultivar, in simplified rotations or monocultures, and relying on extensive use of agrochemical inputs have been preferred to more diverse, self-sustaining cropping systems, regardless of the environmental consequences. However, there is increasing evidence that such intensive agroecosystems have led to a decline in biodiversity as well as threatening the environment and have damaged a number of ecosystem services such as the biogeochemical nutrient cycles and the regulation of climate and water quality. Consequently, the current challenge facing agriculture is to ensure the future of food production while reducing the use of inputs and limiting environmental impacts and the loss of biodiversity. Here, we review examples of multiple cropping systems that aim to use biotic interactions to reduce chemical inputs and provide more ecosystem services than just provisioning. Our main findings are the identification of underlying ecological processes and management strategies related to the provision of pairs of ecosystem services namely food production and a regulation service. We also found gaps between ecological knowledge and the constraints of agricultural practices in taking account of the interactions and possible trade-offs between multiple ecosystem services as well as socioeconomic constraints. We present guidelines for the design of multiple cropping systems combining ecological, agricultural, and genetic concepts and approaches.

Management of service crops for the provision of ecosystem services in vineyards: A review

“…As the knowledge of cover crop species and their suitable management may be long to master and because this practice also involves supplementary costs and long-term economic returns, vinegrowers may be discouraged to adopt it (Dunn et al, 2016). Methods for evaluating the achievement of services in cropping systems, and for designing agroecosystems providing targeted services have recently been proposed in the scientific literature (Gaba et al, 2015;Rapidel et al, 2015;Schipanski et al, 2014). ES management has to be driven through various action levers i.e.…”

“…Several methods of selection of species according to targeted services have been proposed, such as multicriteria decision analysis (Ramírez-García et al, 2015), or trait-based approaches Tardy et al, 2015). Sowing densities, strip arrangements, field architecture, plant diversity are other management options that can impact potential services (Gaba et al, 2015). Tactical decisions (e.g.…”

Structural characteristics determine productivity in complex cocoa agroforestry systems

“…In both tropical and temperate areas, the challenge is to develop more sustainable and ecologically efficient cropping systems, among others by promoting cultivated biodiversity (Altieri and Rosset 1995;Malézieux et al 2008). Different "ecologically intensive" model design frameworks have thus been proposed (Malézieux 2012;Gaba et al 2015). However, existing multispecies systems-from which agronomists could be inspired-are much harder to assess than monospecies systems because of their inherent heterogeneity, hence the many difficulties to quantify interactions (Doré et al 2008;Malézieux et al 2008).…”

Perennial Grain Legume Domestication Phase I: Criteria for Candidate Species Selection

“…The development of new perennial grains is driven by the need for renewable, sustainable agricultural commodities whose production limits negative anthropogenic effects on the environment and provides positive ecological benefits. Measurable benefits to humans include soil conservation, landscape restoration, restoration of nutrient and hydrological cycles and increased biodiversity [102]. Therefore, the potential ecosystem services provided by any domesticate should be monitored closely, enhanced through breeding and promoted as beneficial and necessary attributes.…”