2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple dependent state sampling plans for lot acceptance based on measurement data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compared the efficiency of the proposed plan over the multiple dependent state (MDS) plan proposed by Balamurali and Jun (2007) and the resubmitted sampling plan proposed by Aslam et al (2013). For comparison purposes, we consider the same values of AQL and LQL for the three sampling plans (the proposed EWMA plan λ = 0.1, the unknown sigma MDS plan with m = 2 and the resubmitted symmetric case) when α = 5% and β = 10%.…”
Section: Advantages Of the Proposed Planmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also compared the efficiency of the proposed plan over the multiple dependent state (MDS) plan proposed by Balamurali and Jun (2007) and the resubmitted sampling plan proposed by Aslam et al (2013). For comparison purposes, we consider the same values of AQL and LQL for the three sampling plans (the proposed EWMA plan λ = 0.1, the unknown sigma MDS plan with m = 2 and the resubmitted symmetric case) when α = 5% and β = 10%.…”
Section: Advantages Of the Proposed Planmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Attribute plans are easy to implement while variable plans are more informative than attribute sampling plans. More details about variable plans can be seen in Collani (1990), Seidel (1997), Govindaraju and Kuralmani (1992), Govindaraju and Balamurali (1998), Balamurali and Jun (2006), Balamurali and Jun (2007), Tsai and Lin (2010), Klufa (2010), Vangjeli (2012), Aslam, Huang, Jun, Ahmad, and Rasool (2011), Aslam et al (2012), Wang and Tsai (2012) and Aslam, Wu, Azam, and Jun (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balamurali and Jun (2007) presented a variable acceptance sampling plan using the MDS scheme and concluded that this sampling scheme is better in risk protection to the manufacturer and the consumer as compared to the conventional single and double sampling plans. studied the MDS schemes in the area of acceptance sampling plans and argued that the MDS sampling performs better than the conventional single sampling plans in terms of average sample number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inspection efficiency in such instances can be improved by utilizing the accumulated quality history of previous lots information. The MDS sampling plans are not only based on the current lot, but also on preceding lots [27]. With the absence of autocorrelation between linear profiles, [16] provided MDS sampling plan based on yield index .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%