2023
DOI: 10.3390/a16100457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Factor Analysis Based on NIPALS Algorithm to Solve Missing Data Problems

Andrés F. Ochoa-Muñoz,
Javier E. Contreras-Reyes

Abstract: Missing or unavailable data (NA) in multivariate data analysis is often treated with imputation methods and, in some cases, records containing NA are eliminated, leading to the loss of information. This paper addresses the problem of NA in multiple factor analysis (MFA) without resorting to eliminating records or using imputation techniques. For this purpose, the nonlinear iterative partial least squares (NIPALS) algorithm is proposed based on the principle of available data. NIPALS presents a good alternative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to analysis, a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test was used; the value was KMO = 0.6, which shows that the data are suited for factor analysis [52]. The decomposition was performed using NIPALS as the most standard algorithm providing the minimum numbers of ambiguous alarms and missed alarms [53,54], with the maximum number of iterations of 50 and a convergence criterion of 0.0001. The number of components describing the source set was selected using the cross-validation by the v-fold method; v was equal to 7, which provided the minimum error rate of the following PCA procedure and algorithm efficiency [55].…”
Section: Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to analysis, a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test was used; the value was KMO = 0.6, which shows that the data are suited for factor analysis [52]. The decomposition was performed using NIPALS as the most standard algorithm providing the minimum numbers of ambiguous alarms and missed alarms [53,54], with the maximum number of iterations of 50 and a convergence criterion of 0.0001. The number of components describing the source set was selected using the cross-validation by the v-fold method; v was equal to 7, which provided the minimum error rate of the following PCA procedure and algorithm efficiency [55].…”
Section: Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%