2021
DOI: 10.1177/03611981211045205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-Factors Aware Car-Following Model for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles

Abstract: The emergence of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAV) is of great significance to the development of transportation systems. This paper proposes a multiple-factors aware car-following (MACF) model for CAVs with the consideration of multiple factors including vehicle co-optimization velocity, velocity difference of multiple PVs, and space headway of multiple PVs. The Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) dataset and the genetic algorithm are used to calibrate the parameters of the model. The stability of the MA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autonomous vehicles choose the appropriate driving strategy based on the scenario they are in, depending on which a multi-factor perceptional following model is proposed. This considers several factors such as vehicle synergistic optimization, velocity difference of multiple CAV vehicles, and spacing of multiple HDVs, through which the average velocity and traffic flow of the system can be effectively improved ( 4 ). Chen et al extracted information from the strategy process of human drivers and developed a lane-changing algorithm for autonomous vehicles.…”
Section: Review On Driving Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Autonomous vehicles choose the appropriate driving strategy based on the scenario they are in, depending on which a multi-factor perceptional following model is proposed. This considers several factors such as vehicle synergistic optimization, velocity difference of multiple CAV vehicles, and spacing of multiple HDVs, through which the average velocity and traffic flow of the system can be effectively improved ( 4 ). Chen et al extracted information from the strategy process of human drivers and developed a lane-changing algorithm for autonomous vehicles.…”
Section: Review On Driving Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there is rich experience in both domestic and international research in relation to MTF. Researchers have proposed driving strategy methods using dynamical models ( 4 ), mathematical algorithms ( 5 ), and game theory ( 6 ). With the development of onboard sensors and network connectivity technology, CAVs collect data through onboard sensors as the input to strategy methods and subsequently analyze the data to obtain a CAV-appropriate driving strategy ( 7 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the existence of numerous AS pilot programs globally, there is a notable absence of comprehensive and robust guidelines to ensure the effectiveness of these programs in achieving reliable outcomes and valuable perceptions [7]. The swift advancements in CAV technology, coupled with the superior performance of managed lanes, have attracted growing interest in exploring the potential benefits of CAVs operating within such lanes [14]. Hence, the primary goal of this study is to address the gaps in the literature by providing a novel approach for examining the effects of introducing AS on dedicated lanes through the intuitively designed scenarios under microscopic environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their model has made significant progress in mitigating traffic fluctuations and reducing fuel consumption and car emissions. Ma et al ( 3 ) proposed a multi-factor perceived following model of connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs), which considers multiple factors such as vehicle collaborative optimization speed, speed difference, and spatial headway. In mixed traffic flow composed of human-driven vehicles (HVs) and CAVs, it can effectively improve the average speed and traffic capacity of the system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%