2020
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2020.2978491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Features and Isolation Forest-Based Fast Anomaly Detector for Hyperspectral Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiments, the anomaly detection performance of the proposed SSIIFD is evaluated and compared to that of five state-of-the-art detectors: RX [6], LRASR [13], PTA [15], KIFD [24], and MFIFD [28]. Specifically, RX is a representative statistical modeling-based technique.…”
Section: Comparison Methods and Evaluation Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiments, the anomaly detection performance of the proposed SSIIFD is evaluated and compared to that of five state-of-the-art detectors: RX [6], LRASR [13], PTA [15], KIFD [24], and MFIFD [28]. Specifically, RX is a representative statistical modeling-based technique.…”
Section: Comparison Methods and Evaluation Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, they offer the flexibility to learn a model from an initial (regular) data distribution and are able to flag data that significantly differ from the learned distribution. For this reason, in order to evaluate the performance obtained by ECHAD, in our experiments we considered three state-of-the-art competitor methods falling in this class, namely One-Class SVM [2], [33]- [35], Isolation Forest [3], [36], [37], and LOF [4], [38], [39], which are widely adopted in the recent literature, and are shown to provide highly accurate predictions.…”
Section: B Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several one-class classification methods have been proposed. Among them, it is worth mentioning One-Class SVM [2], [32]- [35], Isolation Forest [3], [36], [37], One-Class Local Outlier Factor (LOF) [4], [38], [39] and approaches based on autoencoders [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global RX (GRX) and local RX (LRX) are two versions of the RX algorithm. The GRX method uses the whole image to model the background, while LRX utilizes the local dual-window to model the background [27]. The kernel RX (KRX) [28] algorithm is a nonlinear version of the RX algorithm that uses kernel theory to transform every pixel to a high-dimensional space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods do not require any statistical assumptions and have, thus, attracted significant attention [20]. These techniques make use of the conspicuous characteristics of anomalies: the low probability of occurrence and the different spectral signature from the background pixels [27]. There are several forms of representation-based methods, including the sparse representation-based methods [1,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37], the low-rank methods [38][39][40][41][42][43], and the collaborative methods [44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%