1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-06301-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Fourier Series and Fourier Integrals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) holds for all f , g in L p = L p (X, μ), whenever 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. Since in addition f L p (X,μ) = 0 implies that f = 0 (μ-a.e.…”
Section: P and Weak L Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) holds for all f , g in L p = L p (X, μ), whenever 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. Since in addition f L p (X,μ) = 0 implies that f = 0 (μ-a.e.…”
Section: P and Weak L Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 0 < p < 1, inequality (1.1. 3) is reversed when f , g ≥ 0. However, the following substitute of (1.1.3) holds:…”
Section: P and Weak L Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let A be a -PDO on n−1 with a symbol A I = a 0 I + −1 a 0 I , and let W 0 be a -FIO operator of the form (3.31) with a symbol W 0 I = p 0 I + −1 p 0 I . Suppose that a 0 I = p 0 I = 1 in a neighborhood D 0 of I 0 , and that the symbols satisfy(2) and(3)in Proposition 3.9 with l ≥ M + 2 + 2n and > l + n − 1 /2. R 1 and R 0 are -FIOs of order 0 of the form (3.31) and such that (1) the symbol of R 0 satisfies (3.40), Downloaded by [The UC Irvine Libraries] at 02:obtain from (A.51) the homological equations (3.33) for any with ≤ N − 1, which we solve by recurrence with respect to .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We need condition (i) here to use (2.2) k + 1 times, and condition (ii) guarantees the convergence of partial integrals E λ (φf )(0), φ ∈ C ∞ 0 ( ) (see [1]). So we have Lemma 3 Let n 0 = [ n− 3 2 ] and f (x) ∈ W P n 0 ( ).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If A is the self-adjoint extension in L 2 (R n ) of the elliptic differential operator A(D) with the domain of definition C ∞ 0 (R n ) and {E λ }-be a decomposition of the identity of A, then the corresponding eigenfunction expansion of any function f ∈ L 2 (R n ) will coincide with (1.1) (see [1]). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%