The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) offers a compelling target to modulate the immune system. AHR agonists alter adaptive immune responses, but the consequences differ across studies. We report here the comparison of four agents representing different sources of AHR ligands in mice infected with influenza A virus (IAV): TCDD, prototype exogenous AHR agonist; PCB126, pollutant with documented human exposure; ITE, novel pharmaceutical; and FICZ, degradation product of tryptophan. All four compounds diminished virus-specific IgM levels and increased the proportion of regulatory T cells. TCDD, PCB126 and ITE, but not FICZ, reduced virus-specific IgG levels and CD8 + T cell responses. Similarly, ITE, PCB126, and TCDD reduced Th1 and Tfh cells, whereas FICZ increased their frequency. In Cyp1a1-deficient mice, all compounds, including FICZ, reduced the response to IAV. Conditional Ahr knockout mice revealed that all four compounds require AHR within hematopoietic cells. Thus, differences in the immune response to IAV likely reflect variances in quality, magnitude, and duration of AHR signaling. This indicates that binding affinity and metabolism may be stronger predictors of immune effects than a compound's source of origin, and that harnessing AHR will require finding a balance between dampening immune-mediated pathologies and maintaining sufficient host defenses against infection.There is considerable evidence that signaling through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) alters the course of adaptive immune responses in a manner that can be protective or detrimental. Adaptive immune responses underlie host protection from pathogens, but when improperly controlled they contribute to numerous diseases. The AHR's remarkable capacity to modulate T cell responses has been demonstrated in autoimmune diseases 1-5 , allergic inflammation 6,7 , and inflammatory bowel diseases [8][9][10] . Yet, these reports also suggest that different AHR ligands may bias adaptive immune responses in opposite directions, and that exposure to the same ligand can worsen or improve pathology in different disease models 1,2,11 . While these issues remain to be resolved, the ability of the AHR to modulate T cell differentiation and T cell-dependent immune responses has generated enthusiasm about targeting therapeutic agents at the AHR in order to modulate the progression of a large spectrum of immune-mediated diseases 12,13 .Yet, there is another aspect of AHR immunobiology that has direct bearing on the potential success of new strategies to use AHR ligands as treatment modalities: the impact on host responses to infection. Several reports demonstrate the importance of AHR in sensing microbes, including pathogenic and commensal bacteria, mycobacteria, and fungi [14][15][16][17] . Epidemiological studies show strong correlations between exposure to anthropogenically-derived AHR ligands from the environment and increased incidence and severity of respiratory infections, most notably viral infections 18,19 . These observations have been extended with a...