1991
DOI: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90280-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple gating modes and the effect of modulating factors on the μI sodium channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

26
124
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
26
124
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1A). Our data show that co-expression of the /I1 and the a subunit produce the same effects as the unknown factor in the low molecular weight mRNA [2]. When the p, subunit is co-expressed with the a subunit, the equilibrium between gating modes appears shifted such that the faster gating mode dominates.…”
Section: Febs Letters July 1993mentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1A). Our data show that co-expression of the /I1 and the a subunit produce the same effects as the unknown factor in the low molecular weight mRNA [2]. When the p, subunit is co-expressed with the a subunit, the equilibrium between gating modes appears shifted such that the faster gating mode dominates.…”
Section: Febs Letters July 1993mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…These channels exhibited fast gating behavior and the single channel conductance was 21 pS (Fig. 2B) which is identical to the single-channel conductance of the a subunit alone [2,8].…”
Section: Febs Letters July 1993mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The opening of sodium channels is preceded by multiple voltage-dependent transitions between closed states and closed-inactivated states that may occur in parallel pathways during the activation process (Armstrong and Bezanilla, 1977;Vandenberg and Bezanilla, 1991;Correa et al, 1992;Sigworth, 1994). In addition, unmodified sodium channels have been shown to be able to switch among multiple gating modes, which differ in both activation and inactivation kinetics (Armstrong and Bezanilla, 1977;Zhou et al, 1991;Hebert et al, 1994). These different kinetic possibilities may give rise to different conformational states that may bind preferentially different toxins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%