2013
DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple gene analyses of caligid copepods indicate that the reduction of a thoracic appendage in Pseudocaligus represents convergent evolution

Abstract: BackgroundThe Caligidae is a family of parasitic copepods containing over 30 recognised genera. They are commercially important parasites as they cause disease in numerous finfish aquaculture facilities globally. Morphological features are used to distinguish between the genera and Pseudocaligus has traditionally been differentiated from Caligus solely by the presence of a much reduced form of the fourth thoracic leg. Currently there are numerous DNA sequences available for Caligus spp. but only the type speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The position of Lepeophtheirus natalensis in molecular phylogenetic analyses of the caligids has been anomalous as it is recovered separate from other Lepeophtheirus species (Freeman et al, 2013). This has led to questioning of the monophyletic status of Lepeophtheirus (Morales- Serna et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The position of Lepeophtheirus natalensis in molecular phylogenetic analyses of the caligids has been anomalous as it is recovered separate from other Lepeophtheirus species (Freeman et al, 2013). This has led to questioning of the monophyletic status of Lepeophtheirus (Morales- Serna et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lepeophtheirus natalensis tends to be recovered separate from other Lepephtheirus species in sequence-based analyses of relationships within the Caligidae (e.g. Freeman et al, 2013), and this has fueled doubts concerning the monophyletic status of Lepeophtheirus (e.g. Morales-Serna et al, 2014).…”
Section: Caligus Dakari Van Beneden 1892mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNA extractions were completed on the preserved tissues, and PCR products performed using the nematode‐specific primers Nem‐18SF/R and cycling conditions described by Floyd, Rogers, Lambshead, and Smith (2005). Initial sequencing reads allowed the design of a new forward primer ERN‐fwd 5′ acc gta gcg aga cgc cct act g that was more specific for philonemid nematodes to use with the reverse primer 18gM (Freeman, Anshary, & Ogawa, 2013). A consensus sequence of 1,734 bp was generated of small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) and submitted to GenBank with the accession number .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blast searches in DNA databases showed that the eagle ray nematode was most closely related to Philonema oncorhynchi with an identity of 94.5% across the SSU rDNA. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methodologies (Freeman et al, 2013). The overall topology of the phylogenetic trees did not vary between the methods used, and the maximum likelihood tree (Figure 2) shows that the eagle ray nematode is robustly supported in a clade with Philonema spp., confirming that this nematode belongs to the superfamily Dracunculoidea and most likely to the genus Philonema (family Philonemidae).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%