1993
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1218(93)90076-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple genotoxicity biomarkers in fish exposed in situ to polluted river water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
62
2
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
62
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it has been successfully applied for the in situ detection of mutagenicity in polluted environment. A significant increase in MN frequency in erythrocytes of fish collected in polluted marine or fresh water environments, compared to fish collected in reference sites was in fact observed by different authors [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Furthermore, it has been successfully applied for the in situ detection of mutagenicity in polluted environment. A significant increase in MN frequency in erythrocytes of fish collected in polluted marine or fresh water environments, compared to fish collected in reference sites was in fact observed by different authors [4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Fish are important indicators of water pollution and the emergence/rate of erythrocytes nuclear morphological abnormalities (ENMAs), including the erythrocytes micronuclei (MN), are being used to examine both the exposure and effect of mutagenic compounds. Indeed, the formation of MN in fish has been increasingly used, in field and laboratorial studies, to detect both the genotoxic potential of pollutants and as an indicator of chromosomal injury (Al-Sabti and Hardig 1990;Al-Sabti and Metcalfe 1995;Baršienė et al 2012;Bolognesi et al 2006;Buschini et al 2004;Cavalcante et al 2008;De Flora et al 1993;Hooftman and de Raat 1982;Hose et al 1987;Minissi et al 1996;Rocha et al 2009;Vigano et al 2002;Winter et al 2007). Besides, if by the one hand the appearance of MN in fish is valuable in ecological risk assessment-even able to disclose the risk of human exposure to drinking water with genotoxicants-on the other hand, the affected fish also pose risks, as feeding is well established as a major toxicant exposure route in human populations (Oates and Cohen 2009;Tijhuis et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fish provide a suitable model for monitoring aquatic genotoxicity and wastewater quality because of their ability to metabolize xenobiotics and accumulate pollutants. A micronucleus assay has been used successfully in several species (De Flora et al, 1993;Al-Sabti and Metcalfe, 1995;Minissi et al, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%