DOI: 10.31274/etd-180810-6056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple hypothesis testing and RNA-seq differential expression analysis accounting for dependence and relevant covariates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the lack of theoretical guarantees on the power to detect DE genes using time‐course RNA‐seq data, the FDR control of existing methods is not well studied. Simulation and empirical studies like Kvam et al (), Law et al (), Chu et al (), and Van den Berge et al () show that both DESeq and edgeR are conservative in some cases while liberal in others for traditional RNA‐seq analysis as well as for analyzing time‐course RNA‐seq data (Sun et al , ; Nguyen, ). Our comprehensive simulations support the same conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the lack of theoretical guarantees on the power to detect DE genes using time‐course RNA‐seq data, the FDR control of existing methods is not well studied. Simulation and empirical studies like Kvam et al (), Law et al (), Chu et al (), and Van den Berge et al () show that both DESeq and edgeR are conservative in some cases while liberal in others for traditional RNA‐seq analysis as well as for analyzing time‐course RNA‐seq data (Sun et al , ; Nguyen, ). Our comprehensive simulations support the same conclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%