2013
DOI: 10.1186/2196-0739-1-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple imputation using chained equations for missing data in TIMSS: a case study

Abstract: In this paper, we document a study that involved applying a multiple imputation technique with chained equations to data drawn from the 2007 iteration of the TIMSS database. More precisely, we imputed missing variables contained in the student background datafile for Tunisia (one of the TIMSS 2007 participating countries), by using Van Buuren, Boshuizen, and Knook's (SM 18:681-694,1999) chained equations approach. We imputed the data in a way that was congenial with the analysis model. We also carried out diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative to deleting records with missing values is represented by multiple imputation methods, which have recently been extended to complex multilevel settings (Goldstein et al, 2014). In the framework of large-scale assessment data, Bouhlila and Sellaouti (2013) applied multiple imputation with chained equations to TIMSS 2007 data, while Foy and O'Dwyer (2013) applied single imputation to TIMSS 2011 data. Weirich et al (2014) conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of imputation methods to handle missing background variables in the IRT model for generating the plausible values.…”
Section: Model Selection and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to deleting records with missing values is represented by multiple imputation methods, which have recently been extended to complex multilevel settings (Goldstein et al, 2014). In the framework of large-scale assessment data, Bouhlila and Sellaouti (2013) applied multiple imputation with chained equations to TIMSS 2007 data, while Foy and O'Dwyer (2013) applied single imputation to TIMSS 2011 data. Weirich et al (2014) conducted a simulation study to evaluate the performance of imputation methods to handle missing background variables in the IRT model for generating the plausible values.…”
Section: Model Selection and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following MICE guidelines for the optimal overall number of imputations [34,35], we generated 20 complete data sets with all missing values imputed. The imputed data sets were then combined to produce an overall set of multiple imputation estimates for each analysis, reflecting both within- and between-imputation variance in the statistical estimates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MICE has several advantages over MVN such as mixed variable type (e.g. continuous, categorical), and skewed continuous variables, shown experimentally by Bouhlila et al [20]. MICE can impute when variables have different types of missingness, but not when multiple types of missingness occur within a single variable.…”
Section: Multiple Imputation (Mi)mentioning
confidence: 99%