2000
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-200009000-00028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-Injection Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparison of Two Methods of Nerve Localization–Nerve Stimulation Versus Paresthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
27
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
27
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They indicated that this is because the low lipid affinity of ropivacaine quickens its dissociation from neural tissue, thus shortening the effect duration. Conversely, the low lipid affinity of ropivacaine to the external neural lipid quickens its transition to nerve action sites, thus resulting in rapid blocking effects [18]. The results of the present study were in agreement with these reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…They indicated that this is because the low lipid affinity of ropivacaine quickens its dissociation from neural tissue, thus shortening the effect duration. Conversely, the low lipid affinity of ropivacaine to the external neural lipid quickens its transition to nerve action sites, thus resulting in rapid blocking effects [18]. The results of the present study were in agreement with these reports.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Clinical studies of axillary block have demonstrated that higher block success is achieved with triple stimulation (median, radial and musculocutaneous nerves) than with single or double stimulation techniques. 21,22 Anatomic studies also show the presence of septae within the axillary sheath which are thought to act as a diffusion barrier to local anesthetic spread. 23 Although visualization of septae is beyond the resolution of the ultrasound equipment we used, it is possible to observe the extent of local anesthetic spread in the axillary compartment under ultrasound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Several advantages have been claimed with this technique, including a higher success rate, the avoidance of vascular injury, and the avoidance of paresthesias and associated neurological injury. [4][5][6] These clinical data are further strengthened by recent animal studies in which stimulating needles were inserted into the nerves under direct vision, yet the electrical current required to achieve a motor response could exceed 1mA. 7 Modern ultrasound machines are capable of imaging individual roots to their cords in the infraclavicular region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%