2002
DOI: 10.1080/00228958.2002.10516371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Intelligences Meet Bloom's Taxonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…His cognitive domain contains six categories that build on each other and increase in complexity, from knowledge (simple recall of factual information) to evaluation (proposing various solutions to problems and selecting and defending the best one). These categories have become the basis for developing learning outcomes in many educational settings (Gray & Waggoner, ; Thompson, Grove, Luxton‐Reilly, Whalley, & Robbins, ; Weigel & Bonica, ). The taxonomy was revised by Anderson and Krathwohl (), who changed the names of each cognitive category from nouns to verbs, and then rearranged the categories so the creating category (formerly the synthesis category) was shown as the highest cognitive skill level.…”
Section: The Flipped Training Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His cognitive domain contains six categories that build on each other and increase in complexity, from knowledge (simple recall of factual information) to evaluation (proposing various solutions to problems and selecting and defending the best one). These categories have become the basis for developing learning outcomes in many educational settings (Gray & Waggoner, ; Thompson, Grove, Luxton‐Reilly, Whalley, & Robbins, ; Weigel & Bonica, ). The taxonomy was revised by Anderson and Krathwohl (), who changed the names of each cognitive category from nouns to verbs, and then rearranged the categories so the creating category (formerly the synthesis category) was shown as the highest cognitive skill level.…”
Section: The Flipped Training Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results indicate that MI theory had a prominent influence on improving test scores, discipline, parent participation, and learning for students with disabilities. The majority of studies on MI have focused on the preK-12 level (primarily, the preK-8 level) as well as classroom application, and they present a rich bank of findings collected from teachers and students (Campbell & Campbell, 1999;Gray & Waggoner, 2002;Hickey, 2004;Kallenbach & Viens, 2002;Kornhaber & Kreshevsky, 1995;Mettetal, Jordan, & Harper, 1997;Noble, 2004;Shore, 2004). The application of MI theory in preK-12 classrooms has been found to improve behavior, aid in the inclusion of students with special needs, encourage parent participation, and create a learning environment supportive of critical-thinking and problem-solving skills (Kornhaber & Fierros, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%