2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5ja00382b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple ion counting measurement strategies by SIMS – a case study from nuclear safeguards and forensics

Abstract: This paper describes and discusses how isotope measurements of low content uranium materials can be optimized using a multi-ion counting system consisting of five discrete dynode electron multiplier (EM) detectors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). This allows the 235 U/ 238 U ratio to be calculated from the measurement on the L1 detector, 7 or as is done in this paper, the 235 U/ 238 U ratio is based on the static measurements (sequence 1), but corrected with the average relative detector yield obtained from the 238 U measurements on L1 and H1 detectors (sequences 1 and 2). The typical variation of relative L1/H1 detector yield within the 100 cycles of a given microbeam measurement is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Analytical Protocol and Data Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1). This allows the 235 U/ 238 U ratio to be calculated from the measurement on the L1 detector, 7 or as is done in this paper, the 235 U/ 238 U ratio is based on the static measurements (sequence 1), but corrected with the average relative detector yield obtained from the 238 U measurements on L1 and H1 detectors (sequences 1 and 2). The typical variation of relative L1/H1 detector yield within the 100 cycles of a given microbeam measurement is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Analytical Protocol and Data Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Previously, only an average DT correction was available for isotope ratio measurements in the CAMECA software. The DT correction was applied to the average count rate over a measurement cycle and was therefore imprecise in the case of rastered beam and nonuniform signal, as it is typically the case for microbeam measurements on small particles.…”
Section: Analytical Protocol and Data Reduction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations