2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: A preliminary study in elderly women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
77
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanical properties in each element were then calculated from the empirical equations provided by Morgan et al [34,35]: Tensile yield strain was considered equal to 7300 microstrain, and compressive yield strain was considered as 10400 microstrain [13,31]. To account for the side-artefact errors in biomechanical testing of cadaveric trabecular specimen due to the isolation from its original structure, the above material properties were increased by a factor of 1.28 [36].…”
Section: D Dxa Based Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanical properties in each element were then calculated from the empirical equations provided by Morgan et al [34,35]: Tensile yield strain was considered equal to 7300 microstrain, and compressive yield strain was considered as 10400 microstrain [13,31]. To account for the side-artefact errors in biomechanical testing of cadaveric trabecular specimen due to the isolation from its original structure, the above material properties were increased by a factor of 1.28 [36].…”
Section: D Dxa Based Finite Element Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subject specific finite element (FE) models can estimate the bone strength in simulated loading scenarios by accounting for geometry and BMD distribution. This method has been recently applied to DXA [7][8][9][10][11], to 2D projections from QCT scans [12], and to QCT images [13][14][15][16] in order to estimate the risk of fracture or the effect of anti-osteoporotic drug treatments. Validation studies that compare the FE outcomes to bone strength measurements performed on cadaveric femora have shown that QCT based FE can predict 80-90% of femoral strength in simulated fall [17][18][19][20][21][22] and 80-94% of femoral strength in simulated one legged stance [21,[23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example in vivo computed tomography data can inform individualised finite element models that accurately predict non-invasively the changes in bone strength or joint stresses in longitudinal studies, both in mice, [37][38][39][40] and in humans. [41][42][43][44][45] This use case is related to refinement, in the definition we provided above, as modelling can replace invasive measurements that involve suffering in animals, and increased risk in humans; or improving the usefulness of the in vivo trials by making measurable a more significant biomarker, while retaining the same level of risk/suffering.…”
Section: In Silico Clinical Trials: Use Cases Current and Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…to evaluate implant loosening resulting in its failure. Many studies still continue to employ elastic analyses to predict arbitrarily post-elastic behaviour (Falcinelli et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%