2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium using PCR multiplexing and multicolor capillary electrophoresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
277
5
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
10
277
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the MNR-MLST and L-SSR typing (also termed MLVA) methods should be more suitable for evolutionary studies by their nature, since they parametrically detect multiple sequence variation that accumulates slowly compared to the highly discriminative PFGE method (51). Thus, multilocus SSR typing is a good tool for epidemiological and phylog-eny studies of V. cholerae, as demonstrated with other bacterial species (22,39,41,48,78). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the MNR-MLST and L-SSR typing (also termed MLVA) methods should be more suitable for evolutionary studies by their nature, since they parametrically detect multiple sequence variation that accumulates slowly compared to the highly discriminative PFGE method (51). Thus, multilocus SSR typing is a good tool for epidemiological and phylog-eny studies of V. cholerae, as demonstrated with other bacterial species (22,39,41,48,78). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger SSRs (L-SSR) consisting of two to 9-bp motifs were successfully used to analyze variation among strains by size determination of the PCR amplicon (39,81). Thus, in the last few years multiple-locus SSR, also termed multiple-locus VNTR analysis (MLVA), has been increasingly recognized as the marker of choice for genotyping a number of pathogens such as Bacillus anthracis (39), Borrelia species (22), Salmonella enterica (48), and Enterococcus faecium (78).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLVA typing was performed as described previously by Lindstedt et al (2004), with some modifications. The modifications were a changed dye set from DS-34 to DS-33 for primer labelling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using labeled primers with different dyes, it is possible to perform multiplex PCR followed by CGE-LIF to provide microbiological identification with less uncertainty than with AGE analysis. This methodology has proven to be a powerful tool for differentiating serovars of S. enterica and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli O157, and therefore, it may be a helpful tool in foodborne disease surveillance programs [74,75].…”
Section: Genome-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%