1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80074-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple mating of queens and the sterility of workers among eusocial hymenoptera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
101
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
101
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, multiple mating might have been selected since it represents the only source of colony genetic diversity. Second, according to the 'polyandry for social harmony' hypothesis, an increase in genetic diversity within colonies is expected to favour a social harmony by reducing the conflicts between the queen and the workers regarding the maternity of males (Woyciechowski & Lomnicki 1987;Ratnieks 1988). Workers of many social Hymenoptera have functional ovaries and may lay haploid-male eggs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, multiple mating might have been selected since it represents the only source of colony genetic diversity. Second, according to the 'polyandry for social harmony' hypothesis, an increase in genetic diversity within colonies is expected to favour a social harmony by reducing the conflicts between the queen and the workers regarding the maternity of males (Woyciechowski & Lomnicki 1987;Ratnieks 1988). Workers of many social Hymenoptera have functional ovaries and may lay haploid-male eggs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in most species they do not reproduce and, when they do so, the proportion of worker-produced males is usually weak compared to queen-produced males (Hammond & Keller 2004). Selection for the lack of worker reproduction depends on two variables: the colony-level cost of workers reproducing (Ratnieks 1988;Hammond & Keller 2004) and the relatedness of workers to queen-and worker-produced males (Woyciechowski & Lomnicki 1987;Ratnieks 1988). The relatedness hypothesis predicts that under polyandry, workers should forego reproduction and/or police worker reproduction (worker-policing) by selectively removing worker-laid eggs or by directing aggression towards workers with developing ovaries (Ratnieks 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This kind of destruction of worker-laid eggs is actually a case of worker policing, i.e., the mutual control of the workers' reproduction (13,32). Because C. floridanus is monogynous with a singly mated queen (50), workers should be selected to lay eggs even in the presence of their mother to maximize their inclusive fitness (13,51). On the other hand, if worker reproduction reduces colony efficiency they should police each other's reproduction despite their greater relatedness to their sons and nephews than to their brothers (13); this seems to be the case in C. floridanus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best model for investigating these issues is the honeybee (Apis mellifera ) colony, where queen mandibular pheromones (QMPs) play a crucial regulatory role in inhibiting ovarian development in adult workers and suppressing their reproduction (Van Oystaeyen et al 2014). A large body of evidence indicates that queen pheromones also inform workers about the presence of the queen or her reproductive potential, which suggests that these pheromones have a signalling rather than control function (Woyciechowski and Lomnicki 1987;Tan et al 2015). However, it is unknown whether QMPs communicate information only between queen and adult workers or are also instrumental in larval development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%