2017
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-114007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Measures are Needed to Quantify Training Loads in Professional Rugby League

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the effect of training mode (conditioning and skills) on multivariate training load relationships in professional rugby league via principal component analysis. Four measures of training load (internal: heart rate exertion index, session rating of perceived exertion; external: PlayerLoad™, individualised high-speed distance) were collected from 23 professional male rugby league players over the course of one 12 wk preseason period. Training was categorised by mode (skills or cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While some of this could be attributed to individual characteristics or simply noise (either measurement error or biological variation), it may well indicate the omission of potentially valuable information contained both within and between training load measures when using a single item to represent internal or external constructs. We have discussed the implications of our findings in relation to the specific measures used, yet our data could also support the notion that multiple measures are needed to accurately quantify internal and external training loads in team sports [31,32,73]. Since it is already common practice to routinely collect several training load measures [85]-which are often based on perceived clinical or practical importance [26]-a pertinent challenge is understanding the most parsimonious and statistically sound variable selection that best represent 'internal' and 'external' constructs for the differing training modes undertaken by team-sport athletes [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While some of this could be attributed to individual characteristics or simply noise (either measurement error or biological variation), it may well indicate the omission of potentially valuable information contained both within and between training load measures when using a single item to represent internal or external constructs. We have discussed the implications of our findings in relation to the specific measures used, yet our data could also support the notion that multiple measures are needed to accurately quantify internal and external training loads in team sports [31,32,73]. Since it is already common practice to routinely collect several training load measures [85]-which are often based on perceived clinical or practical importance [26]-a pertinent challenge is understanding the most parsimonious and statistically sound variable selection that best represent 'internal' and 'external' constructs for the differing training modes undertaken by team-sport athletes [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These may include, but are not limited to: within- [48] or between-athlete [105] correlations, generalized estimating equations [100], mixed effect linear modelling [106] or dimension reduction techniques (e.g. principal component analysis [31,32]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations