1983
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(83)90070-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple metal ion exchange equilibria with humic acid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But it is the salicylic and dicarboxylic groups which are responsible for most of the binding (9,10). This is true in the sample under investigation since the percentage of sulfur and nitrogen is very low compared to the oxygen content as shown in table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But it is the salicylic and dicarboxylic groups which are responsible for most of the binding (9,10). This is true in the sample under investigation since the percentage of sulfur and nitrogen is very low compared to the oxygen content as shown in table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The extent of the interaction will depend on the range of concentration covered in a particular experiment as well as the number of sites available and the metal ions involved. A clear example of this situation was shown by Schnitzer et.al (9) and developed further by Gamble et.al (10), in which a humic acid sample was equilibrated with solutions containing eleven metal ions. At low concentration of metal ions and large amounts of humic acid all metal ions were sorbed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The principal functional groups are the carboxylic and phenolic hydroxyl groups [26]. The values measured for the cation exchange capacity for sedge peat were 1.2 Meq/g and 1.6 Meq/g.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Radionuclide and Trace Metal Migration In Marmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strength of the complexation reaction can be measured by evaluation of a conditional formation constant. (57)(58)(59)46).…”
Section: Organic -Inorganic Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%