2002
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(2002)128:9(891)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple Methods for Determining Stability of Attenuating MTBE Groundwater Plume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, individual well trend results can often provide contradictory, fragmented, or inconclusive results on their own. With advances in computing power and the increasing size of datasets, plumewide trend estimates of center of mass, total dissolved mass, plume area, and mass distribution in a plume have been put forward as useful tools in determination of plume stability (Brauner et al, 2008;Gibbs et al, 2002;Ricker, 2008).…”
Section: Common Approaches To Evaluating Plume Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, individual well trend results can often provide contradictory, fragmented, or inconclusive results on their own. With advances in computing power and the increasing size of datasets, plumewide trend estimates of center of mass, total dissolved mass, plume area, and mass distribution in a plume have been put forward as useful tools in determination of plume stability (Brauner et al, 2008;Gibbs et al, 2002;Ricker, 2008).…”
Section: Common Approaches To Evaluating Plume Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%